Thursday, June 20, 2013

Is Syrian terrorist Abu Musab Al-Suri the future Antichrist?

It has occurred to me many times since writing the articles about Mousavi that, having fallen far out of favor with the mullahs who are the true rulers of Iran, he does not stand much of a chance of becoming the new President of the country in the near future, that office about to be assumed August 3, 2013 by a "moderate" cleric named Hassan Rouhani who was elected in the past week.  Given Mousavi's current age (71 years old) and stated, virtually pro-Western ideology, it does not seem to me he will ever win the approval of the Guardian Council.

Those who have read my posts on the Nostradamus-predicted Third Antichrist, "Mabus," and on Mir Hossain Mousavi and my suspicions about him being the Antichrist should therefore be advised to treat that suspicion with more caution... There are other leading men in the region of the Middle East with names similar to Mousavi and Musab, or identical with them.  (I have also recently discovered, using a prominent version of Hebrew gematria that the number 666, expressed as chi xi stigma in Greek, in Hebrew may translate to m-s-v, that is, final -mem, samekh, and vav.)

Anyway, one such person is named Abu Musab Al-Suri, aka Mustafa Setmariam Nasar, reportedly the most dangerous terrorist in the world by one account.  Spain wanted him extradited for his suspected role in the 2004 Madrid terrorist attack perpetrated by Al-Qaeda.  The US reportedly captured him or perhaps got custody of him from Pakistan's capture of him for a short time in the mid 2000s, then reportedly renditioned him to Syria (where he was born) to extract more information out of him.  But in late 2011 due to deteriorating relations with the US over the Syrian civil war, Syria released him and he has been free ever since.  It is now apparent from at least one Facebooker that he is now aiding the rebellion against the Syrian government.  As the Antichrist is prophesied to come to power by illicit but apparently bloodless means (by flatteries or intrigue), the post-revolutionary government is likely to be weak, run by a provisional regime and vulnerable to a coup d'etat.

Here is a very, very interesting quote from Abu Musab Al-Suri regarding the Afghanistan war which, not surprisingly, he also had a role in as a member of Al Qaeda attached to the Taliban: "The prophet’s prophecies assures the return of Afghanistan and the rise of the black flags army from Khurasan. We will win and continue our role together till victory."  This statement indicates an acute awareness of the hadiths about the Mahdi organizing massive forces to come from that area and, under those black flags, erase the state of Israel from the map.  Afghanistan was also part of the ancient Seleucid Empire in its beginnings, while Syria and Iraq were its heartland.  (Syria still claims the Turkish city of Antakya, formerly known as Antioch, capital of Seleucid Syria, as its own.)

And as Abu Musab Al-Suri is a rather handsome, redheaded, light-skinned green eyed Caucasian it is not hard to foresee that he could cultivate an image friendly to European nations and to the United States, despite his previous activities with Al-Qaeda.

So this is one possible example of a potential Antichrist with a known hatred of Israel and America, who is now involved in the rebellion against Bashar Al-Assad of Syria.

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

So the headlines all over the place are blaring that Obama supposedly cannot guarantee that Social Security checks will go out if the government defaults on the national debt on August 2.

Pardon the frick out of me, but last I checked, Social Security was supposed to be solvent through 2036 and is SELF FUNDED via FICA taxes!! That tells me that the President has no authority to hold up payments since that entire program is reckoned SEPARATELY from the general funding of the Federal Government.

So... either he means that Social Security is now being funded out of the general budget and is actually itself in default, or he simply means to raid it for funds to pay for other ongoing schemes, or... he is lying in an attempt to blackmail senior citizens into a push for new taxes. If the first is true, he has concealed this fact from the GAO and other accounting authorities which may be a federal crime; if the second is true, he is conspiring to commit fraud, and if the third is true, he is treasonably misleading the Congress into making bad decisions.

It's time to impeach this President, remove him from office (and all of his appointees), try him for the appropriate charges and by the grace of God (to us, not to him) convict him and send him to prison long enough to still have to be here for the denouement of whatever chaos he has already wreaked upon the rest of us.

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Sugar drink ban in Boston is unwise

I emailed the following to Mayor Thomas of Boston, Massachusetts:

Dear Mayor Thomas:

Two points: First, banning the sale of beverages with sugar in them restricts the choice of consumers who are not all necessarily interested in drinking something during lunch and breaks that doesn't taste good to them. By banning the sale of these drinks, Boston is sending a message that consumers should be treated like children or cattle to be managed. This is not a good idea if you want Boston to be represented as a city that welcomes visitors to its government facilities. It's really an act of overt hostility to commerce, to city workers, to voters, to private citizens and to tourists.

Second, has anyone considered that there are people with special medical needs, such as insulin-dependent diabetes, who occasionally need a shot of sugar delivered in liquid form to, for instance, recover from accidental overdoses of insulin? I've seen this happen for myself, and in that situation a very fast acting sugar beverage saved a man's life. By banning these drinks the city of Boston may have irresponsibly created a danger of insulin shock or a similar medical crisis potentially killing someone unable to consume enough sugar in time to avert disaster. Boston may have opened itself up to significant liability in this issue.


Harry A. Van Twistern
St. Petersburg, FL

Friday, March 11, 2011

My___----__@#$++++==== ugh.

I would just like to know, when is Myspace going to fix their horrible slow unergonomic inconvenient mess of a website and make it usable again? Is pride in the way? Tell you what, um, Tom Anderson, let's just start from the probably true supposition that you have no dignity left because whatever you or your drug-addicted programmers did didn't work out and made your site a dungheap. Not to mention your biggest rival Facebook (which I use) is run by a peeping pervert and can still program rings around your people. After you contemplate this on the Tree of Woe, just go back and set it to the way it was before. Then take lessons from Facebook, Collarme, or whoever else actually has something that works on how to run a social networking site BEFORE you go changing it again. 'K? Bye.

Thursday, March 3, 2011


An old letter titled, "THE CHEMTRAIL FRAUD" that I posted to the Coast to Coast AM radio program on June 17, 2008; it bears repeating here and now because the chemtrail thing just never seems to die.


Sorry that I worded the title so harshly, but I really can't characterize this controversy any other way in good conscience. After listening to the show this morning and then surfing the Web looking for information about chemtrails, I came to a site called and some other links thereto and found what I unfortunately suspected -- a lot of blatantly false information and misrepresented photos about what are -- for real, honestly, hand to God, I swear -- CONTRAILS.

To recap what a contrail is, picture yourself in one of our modern passenger jet aircraft flying over, say, Missouri. While you are sitting and relaxing, reading a book, or if you happen to be terrified of flight, white knuckling and staring out the window hoping the engines don't fall off in mid-flight, you look out and happen to notice that behind the jet engine on your side of the plane is a white vapor appearing a certain distance behind the engine. You ask the stewardess what that is, and she says "Oh, that's just the contrail." She gives this explanation so glibly that it's as if you are supposed to be satisfied with that information, but the word itself means nothing without a definition.

Here's one from Merriam-Webster online: "streaks of condensed water vapor created in the air by an airplane or rocket at high altitudes." The most important thing to get out of this is the content of a contrail is WATER. And water does certain things under certain conditions. At certain altitudes, under what weathermen call saturated conditions, it condenses into a cloud.

Now, before I go into explaining what saturation of air is, let me first go into my background as a recently graduated auto mechanic trainee and discuss what actually comes out of an airplane engine exhaust. Air and fuel are mixed for combustion, in order to provide thrust for the aircraft, at a given ratio which is known as the stoichiometric ratio. Stoichiometric just means that the ratio is the correct ratio for the type of fuel used and the oxidizer used to combust it. For gasoline, for example, the stoichiometric ratio of air to gasoline is 14.7 to 1. For methane, it's a lot higher, about 37.6 parts air to 1 fuel. For jet fueled engines it's technically about 15:1, similar to gasoline, however additional air is added to flow through the engine to cool the turbines because otherwise they overheat. The end result of this is the same regardless of the hydrocarbon-based fuel used -- you get energy production and waste products, which under the best combustion conditions yield some carbon dioxide and a much greater amount of water. There are also traces of unburnt hydrocarbons and if the reaction is too hot or too lean, some nitrous oxides as well, but the vast majority of the waste generated is primarily water vapor, secondarily carbon dioxide. This comes out the tailpipe of your car, and mixed with uncombusted coolant air, it comes out the back end of a jet engine.

Now about saturation -- this is an atmospheric condition which occurs when the humidity level -- the percentage of water vapor the air can hold at a given temperature -- is up close to 100 percent. This occurs when the dew point of air is close to the actual air temperature, and the dew point is a more direct measurement of the actual water content of the air. Now there are a few things to remember about this -- one is that the dew point can vary considerably depending on the overall weather conditions, and another is that temperature changes do not translate to dew point change or vice versa, except when air temperature falls into or below the dew point, thus forcing condensation to take place.

So here we go -- hot gas at some hundreds of degrees comes out the back end of the engines on our passenger jet. This hot gas is mostly air, with water vapor and carbon dioxide. The CO2 doesn't affect the formation of clouds so we can ignore that, it's invisible and inert. The hot air coming out of the engine may have a dewpoint of, let's say, 30 degrees Fahrenheit. In gas that's 200 plus degrees it appears to be very dry air, and you do not see vapor forming at that point. However, the air at a high altitude may be as cold as -50 deg F, with a dew point of -60 F. In those conditions you could have a bright clear blue sky without a cloud in it, since the temperature is still 10 degrees away from saturation. However, with the plane passing through it, now you have this part of the air heated to 200 degrees, with the dewpoint rising past 30 degrees as the engine's exhaust water is added to this part of the air. Very soon, the air temperature returns to ambient (what it was before the plane passed through it.) But the dewpoint which was at -60 F has now been raised over 90 degrees in that parcel of air!

Upon cooling down below 30 degrees vapor forms as the air is now saturated and cannot hold the moisture as vapor, it has to condense. By the time the air temp has dropped below -40 the condensation has already frozen into ice particles. These form the contrail that fans out behind the plane as wind currents push and pull at the trail. Now, with the dew point around the trail (not in it) still about -60 F, the ice particles which have formed a pretty dense contrail begin to evaporate into the surrounding air. However, they will normally take hours to do so because the dewpoint is not very low for that altitude and ice takes longer to evaporate than water droplets do. So basically the plane has done nothing more or less than create a type of cirrus cloud, and cirrus happens to be a kind that can hang around for days given the right conditions.

Now I can tell you, on my honor as a weather buff of 25 years with some courses under my belt in the field, experience taking weather readings, and studying the subject on my own time, that all of the pictures I have seen of trails in the sky are contrails. It seems extremely unlikely to me that if nefarious organizations could even pepper the sky with noxious powders and whatnot, that they would give away their activities by using substances that reflect as much light as a cloud -- and by the way most aerosols are invisible to the human eye, including volcanic ash below certain concentrations and sizes and most dust. Also, given the vast scale of the atmosphere and the complexity of wind patterns in it, it seems very very unlikely to me that high altitude spraying would have any meaningfully intentional consequences on any ground targets. Effective spraying has to be done at as low an altitude as safely possible, to limit the area covered and to ensure that the area you WANT to cover is reached by the sprayed contents.

Now about the photos -- some of them show contrails that can form at midlevel altitudes in saturated conditions where the contrail is a cloud of water droplets, too warm to freeze. These contrails will last just as long as any of the other streetlike clouds (altocumulus or altostratus) that may be in the vicinity, and they can be fairly thick for a while, again depending on saturation conditions. Other trails seen in photos, notably the ones with "rainbow effects," are no doubt higher altitude ice particle trails. What happens here is the light from the sun hits a certain angle from the viewer or photographer, and the ice particles scatter the colors in it forming a rainbow or a sun dog, from the viewer's perspective. Same thing happens in cirrus clouds -- it's not magic and it's not chemically induced, it's a property of the optical physics of water. Ice particles are more highly reflective than liquid cloud droplets, so you will tend to see that more often in ice particle trails, though it's also possible in droplet trails.

Certain photos show crisscrossing trails as well. This is common because air travel routes do often cross over each other, usually at different altitudes (when air traffic controllers are doing their jobs, which we like to think is all of the time.) You will probably see this sort of thing a lot in regions between several airport hubs.

I hope this helps to clear up the contrail mystery somewhat. :)

Friday, February 25, 2011

A Father Daughter Talk (reposted from anonymous)

Lifted from a forwarded email sent by a friend:

A young woman was about to finish her first year of college. Like so many others her age, she considered herself to be very liberal, and among other liberal ideals, was very much in favor of higher taxes to support more government programs, in other words redistribution of wealth.

She was deeply ashamed that her father was a rather staunch conservative, a feeling she openly expressed. Based on the lectures that she had participated in, and the occasional chat with a professor, she felt that her father had for years harbored an evil, selfish desire to keep what he thought should be his.

One day she was challenging her father on his opposition to higher taxes on the rich and the need for more government programs.

The self-professed objectivity proclaimed by her professors had to be the truth and she indicated so to her father. He responded by asking how she was doing in school.

Taken aback, she answered rather haughtily that she had a 4.0 GPA, and let him know that it was tough to maintain, insisting that she was taking a very difficult course load and was constantly studying, which left her no time to go out and party like other people she knew. She didn't even have time for a boyfriend, and didn't really have many college friends because she spent all her time studying.

Her father listened and then asked, "How is your friend Audrey doing?"

She replied, "Audrey is barely getting by. All she takes are easy classes, she never studies and she barely has a 2.0 GPA. She is so popular on campus; college for her is a blast. She's always invited to all the parties and lots of times she doesn't even show up for classes because she's too hung over."

Her wise father asked his daughter, "Why don't you go to the Dean's office and ask him to deduct 1.0 off your GPA and give it to your friend who only has a 2.0. That way you will both have a 3.0 GPA and certainly that would be a fair and equal distribution of GPA."

The daughter, visibly shocked by her father's suggestion, angrily fired back, "That's a crazy idea, how would that be fair! I've worked really hard for my grades! I've invested a lot of time, and a lot of hard work! Audrey has done next to nothing toward her degree. She played while I worked my tail off!"

The father slowly smiled, winked and said gently, "Welcome to the conservative side of the fence."

If you ever wondered what side of the fence you sit on, this is a great test!

If a conservative doesn't like guns, he doesn't buy one.
If a liberal doesn't like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.

If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn't eat meat.
If a liberal is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.

If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his
A liberal wonders who is going to take care of him.

If a conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels.
Liberals demand that those they don't like be shut down.

If a conservative is a non-believer, he doesn't go to church.
A liberal non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced.
(Unless it's a foreign religion, of course!)

If a conservative decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it.
A liberal demands that the rest of us pay for his.

If a conservative reads this, he'll forward it so his friends can have a
good laugh.
A liberal will delete it because he's "offended."

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Is Passover 33 AD the fulcrum of history?

‎33 1/2 BR Fall of 2 BC Jesus Christ was born to a virgin in Bethlehem with blood ties to a royal family in southern Britain, the Silures.
33 1/2 AR Fall of 64 AD Paul the Apostle was somewhere in Western Europe or Britain preaching the gospel of Jesus Christ. His mother had already married a Roman Senator with British lineage -- the same royal family that Mary was related to.

1484 years BR (before the Resurrection) -- 1452 BC The Torah was given to Moses on Mt Sinai, a year after the Exodus, instituting full orbed legalism in religion.
1484 years AR (after the Resurrection) -- 1517 AD Martin Luther nailed his 95 Theses to the Castle Church door in Wittenberg, igniting the Protestant Revolution and setting fire to legalism.

‎1885 BR 1853 BC 400 years before the Exodus, Isaac was born, the child of promise to Abraham and Sarah by miracle. Abraham was 100, Sarah 90 years old.
1885 AR 1918 AD World War 1 ended after General Allenby marched into Jerusalem freeing it from the Ottoman Empire, paving the way for the founding of the state of Israel.

‎1899 BR 1867 BC Ishmael was born illegitimately to Abraham via his wife's Egyptian slave Hagar.
1899 AR 1932 AD the Kingdom of Nejd and Hejaz was renamed Saudi Arabia, and Iraq became an independent monarchy.

1900 BR 1868 BC was the infamous "tent meeting" between Abraham and Hagar.
1900 AR 1933 AD was the year Hitler ascended to power in Germany.

‎1910 BR 1878 BC Abraham left Haran for Canaan at 75 years of age.
1910 AR 1943 AD was the height of World War 2, when Polish Jews arrived in Palestine and began working for the future independence of Israel, and interestingly also the year Martin Noth published his seminal work on the Pentateuch... it's got a long German title. :)

1915 BR 1883 BC The Book of Jasher tells us that Abraham received promises from God about his descendants inheriting from the Euphrates to the Nile. He was 70 years old.
1915 AR 1948 AD A new nation appeared on the Earth, in 1948 AD, called Israel.

1985 BR 1953 BC was when Abraham, called the "Father of Faith," was born.
1985 AR 2018 AD ought to be a very interesting year. ;)